Memedroid: the best site to see, rate and share funny memes! A place to post memes about Minecraft! sheesh. I dunno, it just frustrates me that people keep poking s**t when there is obviously nothing wrong with it. Butfrom a serious perspective this article refers to realistic conflict and it makes absolute sense that people, especially young impressionable people are made to realise that actions in the real world have consequences. It stopped short of clarifying quite what these consequences should be, suggesting only that "game scenarios should not reward players for actions that in real life would be considered war crimes." We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. We also have an Instagram page, where memes & templates are posted daily! If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). At least I don't play real world war games. In Battlefield 5 or Call of Duty 27, it may not be so simple to dismiss the sight of a photo-realistic person lying in the dust, eyes rolling back, limbs spasming. Although actually, it's more interesting than that, because the first shot fired sends the group fleeing something the player won't know until they commit to pulling the trigger. I also think more realism is always good in games. What would be the fun if this was ethical? Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. Asking for a friend. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile Gta players meme from Gamer Memes Download - MemeZila.com 2022 Friday Good Morning Good Night Back to Home Gamer Memes Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. There are many games which offer zero harassment venues, as does Eve in its NPC corp system. But what it wouldnt let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. Just that their warcrimes have consequences. I don't think it's a bad idea from my completely subjective moral standpoint. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) With arcade or semi-arcade style games (Call of Duty and Battlefield respectively), it isn't suitable, sure it's a pipe dream. 03/10/2013 Guardian Games Blog The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws Don't shoot the civilians. I don't even think that's what the ICRC wants it doesn't want moral doubt to arise purely through aesthetics, it wants designers to think about international law, and about how warfare should operate. Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? This is something military games have been telling us for many years. Ad Bot. 317 comment. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? This is ehy gamers are the most oppressed people in society. Threaded Mode | Linear Mode. Hello! 12/2019 - 11/20212 roky. Tsk, tsk. The idea of an action adventure that put the player into a series of defining humanitarian situations allowing the story to spin-off in the player's moral direction is interesting but it's hugely unlikely in the action cinema world of the modern shooter. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. The BBC were quoting The Red Cross in an interview with The Guardian - these were not the opinions of the BBC. . We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Signup Login. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Ohh man. A series of international statutes, conventions and norms have developed and identify a range of violations related to armed conflict. Skyrim - Civil War Cyrodiil - No emperor. That's all I'll say. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. The biggest subreddit dedicated to providing you with the meme templates you're looking for. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes - funny, gamers, accountable, in-game, crimes. It'd make hell of a lot of sense to add to the realism. F FlyToAllWorld New Member Jun 13, 2013 40 Oct 17, 2013 #7 He added that they were not concerned with fantasy games, but those that mimic situations that might be seen in current armed conflicts, known as first person shooters although he declined to name specific titles. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. "Putin's shelling of Europe's largest nuclear plant takes his reign of . For more information, please see our Dont shoot the civilians. If all transgressions automatically lead to failure, it's a zero-sum game that invites only functional thinking. AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. There's also a robotic empire where you can set it so it can't negotiate with organic species and only robotic ones, 'determined exterminator' it only wants to destroy organics. That Red Cross person should understand that it is just a game and not reality. Hm, tempting. Never listen to games journalists. So I say fine and have my guys ready to launch just in case. Let's start by taking back our Language! We are not talking about censorship or banning anything, he added. The, Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? Is this feasible? Just that Call of Duty-esque games, which are realistic representations of modern conflicts should address the fact their are consequences for your actions. to FFXIV. 457 16. Great list, but it sounds like you need to play Plague Inc. Plague.Inc and People Playground players: My testificate genocide of 2018 is about to unleashed upon the brains of the public. These games were rarely straightforward escapist action yarns, they brought grit and tactical depth, and they did so by utilising Clancy's idea of a world overrun by warring techno factions.. :dazed: Funny, how I read it was someone from the Red Cross saying "I think realistic military simulators should include realistic military consequences for realistic military crimes.". What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. Often the most affecting moments are those hidden in momentary or supplementary features. So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. Ark players. It's not worth the expense. tl;dr all the posts, can't be assed to detail a response to this besides: Have fun watching your game sales tank (HAH?) People must really be bored by the covid lock down. Its difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.. Its just making it more realistic, the same way the military has rules on the battlefield, then gamers have the same rules., While concern over the influence of violence in video games is shared by many, researchers have not established a definitive link. Join us on Discord at https://discord.gg/TtR32WT. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. Ill be 100% on board.. the second democrats are held to the constitution. IFunny Brazil is fun of your life. Home/Uncategorized/ ios notifications png Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Not to mention that a vast majority of first person shooters are played by teenagers and young adults - to think that anyone would seriously consider incarcerating hundreds of thousands of children because they play video games blows my mind. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. Or you could just get a free pornhub premium account. The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. But then, of course, these examples offer more than a mere punishment mechanic which is what the ICRC seems to be asking for. Advertisement. You must log in or register to reply here. 2022 Monday Good Morning Good Night. Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. You are using an out of date browser. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? The Arma series currently on its third iteration is detailed enough to be used for training purposes by many of the world's standing armies. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Should non-gamers be accountable for real-world war crimes? Quit trying to run with 'video games teach kids violence', and blame bad parenting and lack of accountability in this day and age. Though this kind of makes me think of a bunch of 10-year-olds running around in the deserts of the Middle East, screaming long lines of cuss words at each other while shooting anything that moves. It adds immersion. Anthony Dworkin, a war crimes expert and senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations in London, said Putin's actions in Ukraine follow a consistent pattern dating back to . You can change your mind at any time by updating your preferences or unsubscribing from the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at office@forceswatch.net. The latter is too intricately tied in with atavistic gameplay systems for us to extrapolate anything deeper than game over. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: shootouts often occur in areas where civilians are in the line of fire. It may not display this or other websites correctly. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. April 22, 2020, 10:40:49 PM. Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. Success means blending in with the terror squad, and it's up to the player to decide whether that extends as far as shooting civilians. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. It wants developers to say, in this mission you must fly an armed drone over a school where terrorists are known to be hiding, and you must decide whether to open fire. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments' reflection on innocent victims. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. lol what the fu-- crimes in a game how does that work or do you mean like pita throwing a fit and snowflakes melting ? I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. Tx38b. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Home article Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Quote: The International Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations.