Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted IKEv2 SA-Init . The CHILD_SA packet typically contains: Router 2 now builds the reply for the CHILD_SA exchange. Options. You cannot configure IKEv2 through the user interface. I believe it is specific to ISR4K's and being fixed in the November code release. Same here. description Cisco AnyConnect IKEv2 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode ipsec ipv4 tunnel protection ipsec profile staff Take a break, you have now completed the main config on the router, and its time to move onto configuration relating to the client. It contains: ISAKMP Header (SPI/version/flags), SAi1 (cryptographic algorithm that IKE initiator supports), KEi (DH public Key value of the initiator), and N (Initiator Nonce). *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:Adding ident handle 0x80000002 associated with SPI 0x9506D414 for session 8 *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_START_ACCT *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Accounting not required *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHECK_DUPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:AUTH_DONEEvent: EV_CHK4_ROLE, *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_CHK_IKE_ONLY *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_I_OK, *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_R_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_NO_EVENT. This section lists the configurations used in this document. If your network is live, make sure that you understand the potential impact of any command. The IKE_AUTH packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), IDi(initiator's identity), AUTH payload, SAi2(initiates the SA-similar to the phase 2 transform set exchange in IKEv1), and TSi and TSr (Initiator and Responder Traffic selectors): They contain the source and destination address of the initiator and responder respectively for forwarding/receiving encrypted traffic. This does present a bit of a problem for inteligent traffic steering. I am trying to remote access to my Cisco 897VA Router using pre shared key only through Windows 10, Mac OS X and iPhone builtin IKEv2 VPN. Palo Alto IP: 1.1.1.1 Cisco ASA IP: 2.2.2.2 Cisco ASA iKev2 and IPsec parameters: N (Notify payload-optional): The Notify Payload is used to transmit informational data, such as error conditions and state transitions, to an IKE peer. In the IKEv1 Phase 1 settings, you can select one of these modes: Main Mode. With IKEv1, you see a different behavior, because Child SA creation happens during Quick Mode, and the CREATE_CHILD_SA message has a provision to carry the Key Exchange payload that specifies the DH parameters to derive a new shared secret. Nonce Ni(optional): If the CHILD_SA is created as part of the initial exchange, a second KE payload and nonce must not be sent. In this document . Create an ACL in Policies > Local Policy > Access Control ListsPermit port 500I also have the Default Action as Accept in my POC.Copy the ACL name (CTRL C) youll need it for the next step. #crypto ikev2 policy cisco. Edit your Feature Template for the VPN Interface Ethernet that is applied to your physical interface in VPN0.Under ACL/QOS add a IPv4 Ingress Access List using the name of the ACL you created in the first step. If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is not rekeying an existing SA, the N payload must be omitted. Description (partial) Symptom: Garbage value (non-comprehensible) seen in the ikev2 error line "Address type 4132115430 not supported" Conditions: When ikev2 error debugging is turned on. Hi, made some more tests and my problem is the following, IPSec tunnel can be established if remote end is configured without any specific encryption domains for the communication and with a transport network within the tunnel (for routing purpose - like in GRE Tunnel). Following is the output of above router debug crypto ikev2: 189014: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:500/To 1.1.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0], Initiator SPI : 8A15E970577C6140 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0, SA KE N NOTIFY(REDIRECT_SUPPORTED) NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP) NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP) NOTIFY(Unknown - 16430), 189015: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Verify SA init message, 189016: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Insert SA, 189017: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address 1.1.1.1, 189018: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Found Policy 'ikev2policy', 189019: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Processing IKE_SA_INIT message, 189020: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Retrieve configured trustpoint(s), 189021: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Retrieved trustpoint(s): 'TP-self-signed-653483565', 189022: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Get Public Key Hashes of trustpoints, 189023: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Getting of Public Key Hashes of trustpoints FAILED, 189024: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Failed to retrieve Certificate Issuer list, 189025: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Computing DH public key, DH Group 14, 189026: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] DH key Computation PASSED, 189027: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Request queued for computation of DH key, 189028: *Aug 8 14:01:22.149 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Computing DH secret key, DH Group 14, 189029: *Aug 8 14:01:22.149 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Request queued for computation of DH secret, 189030: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] DH key Computation PASSED, 189031: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Calculate SKEYSEED and create rekeyed IKEv2 SA, 189032: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] SKEYSEED calculation and creation of rekeyed IKEv2 SA PASSED, 189033: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:IKEv2 responder - no config data to send in IKE_SA_INIT exch, 189034: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Generating IKE_SA_INIT message. The difference between IKEv1 and IKEv2 is that, in the latter, the Child SAs are created as part of AUTH exchange itself. Uses certificates for the authentication mechanism. You can also check the output of theshow crypto sessioncommand on both routers; this output shows the tunnel session status as UP-ACTIVE. The problem is that a 'VPN Interface IPSEC' is not available: https://www.zscaler.com/resources/solution-briefs/partner-viptela-cisco-sd-wan-deployment.pdf. All of the devices used in this document started with a cleared (default) configuration. 03-12-2019 Thank You. This exchange consists of a single request/response pair and was referred to as a phase 2 exchange in IKEv1. Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. Hence, you would see 'PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none' until the first rekey. This packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), SAr1(cryptographic algorithm that IKE responder chooses), KEr(DH public Key value of the responder), and Responder Nonce. The mode determines the type and number of message exchanges that occur in this phase. The VPN is not connecting at all. INFO_R Event: EV_CHK_INFO_TYPE IKEv2-PROTO-5: (99): SM Trace-> SA: I . Consult your VPN device vendor specifications to verify that . *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:No data to send in mode config set. Zscaler support IP-SLA HTTP probes to check the cloud proxy health, on traditional routers you are able to use 'track' features to, for example, change the admin distance of a static route based on the results of the IP-SLA test. These debug commands are used in this document: *Nov 11 20:28:34.003: IKEv2:Got a packet from dispatcher *Nov 11 20:28:34.003: IKEv2: Processing an item off the pak queue *Nov 11 19:30:34.811: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key by address 10.0.0.2 *Nov 11 19:30:34.811: IKEv2:Adding Proposal PHASE1-prop to toolkit policyle *Nov 11 19:30:34.811: IKEv2:(1): Choosing IKE profile IKEV2-SETUP *Nov 11 19:30:34.811: IKEv2:New ikev2 sa request admitted *Nov 11 19:30:34.811: IKEv2:Incrementing outgoing negotiating sa count by one. IKEv2 is the supporting protocol for IP Security Protocol (IPsec) and is used for performing mutual authentication and establishing and maintaining security associations (SAs). Thanks. Could you please clarify, as I'm waiting for this feature being available for some months now. When i run debug on Cisco ASA i found following, also when tunnel is up i am seeing following messaged in debugging, not sure what is going on. The connection uses a custom IPsec/IKE policy with the UsePolicyBasedTrafficSelectors option, as described in this article.. Select the " Show Advanced Settings " option on the top left and make sure the enable box is checked. 1 Accepted Solution. Looks like its working after I added the ACL to the outside interface. Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: The display of Helpful votes has changed click to read more! Click the Add button to insert a new VPN rule. You wrote "had to change source interface to Service VPN". A Notify Payload may appear in a response message (usually specifying why a request was rejected), in an INFORMATIONAL Exchange (to report an error not in an IKE request), or in any other message to indicate sender capabilities or to modify the meaning of the request.If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA MUST identify the SA being rekeyed. I had the same Firebox and RADIUS server working for IPSec MUVPN, but not for IKEv2. The CLI based workaround for it (on cEdge). 4 Sep 18 2018 17:40:58 750003 Local:80.x.y.z:500 Remote:51.a.b.c:500 Username:51.a.b.c IKEv2 Negotiation aborted due to ERROR: Detected unsupported . The documentation set for this product strives to use bias-free language. IKEv2 Settings Policy - HQ-VPN Auth Type - Preshared Manual Key Key is set in both fields IPsec Tab: Crypto Map Type - Static IKEv2 Mode - Tunnel Transform Sets IKEv2 Proposals - SHA-256 Enable Reverse Route Injection- Checked Enable PFS - Checked Modulus Group - 19 Lifetime Duration - 28800 Lifetime Size - 4608000 Advanced Tab: I opened an SR with TAC for the exact same reason. Refer toCisco Technical Tips Conventionsfor more information on document conventions. Finding Feature Information Prerequisites for Configuring Internet Key Exchange Version 2 Communication over the IPSec Tunnel should be done via VPN1. Keyring: configure the key will be exchanged to establish phase1 and the type which is in our example (pre-shared) Example: #crypto ikev2 keyring cisco. I shared this with TAC too. Do you had to apply some NAT config? IPSEC profile: this is phase2, we will create the transform set in here. You cannot use PSK for authentication of a Remote Access FlexVPN, see this screenshot below from Cisco live presentation BRKSEX-2881. #proposal cisco. All but the headers of all the messages that follow are encrypted and authenticated. This is the CREATE_CHILD_SA request. For more information, refer to IKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. Phase 1: AES256, SHA384, DH14, SA 28800 Phase 2: AES256, SHA256, PFS2048, SA 3600 I'm getting the error: encryption failure: Ike version: ikev2 not supported for peer I'm new to checkpoint. "You can create the IPsec tunnel in the transport VPN (VPN 0) and in any service VPN (VPN 1 through 65530, except for 512). If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA must identify the SA being rekeyed. I also had to mention the same ACL in the local policy for this to work. Note: In this output, unlike in IKEv1, the PFS DH group value appears as "PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none" during the first tunnel negotiation, but, after a rekey occurs, the right values appear. My template for 'VPN Interface IPsec' looks like this: Then, this template is added under the Service VPN : I thought it was all working fine, however I now have a new problem.IKEv2 is working for Phase 1, but IPSEC is failing.For some reason the ISR4K is creating 16 SA's whilst Zscaler only support a maximum of 8 SA's, therefore the tunnel is currently unusable. Its a bug where the ZScaler dumps an IP address based on the config_exchange request sent by cEdge devices. I'll log a TAC case next. if my config was wrong then tunnel shouldn't come up when Cisco ASA sending traffic. KEi (Key-optional): The CREATE_CHILD_SA request might optionally contain a KE payload for an additional DH exchange to enable stronger guarantees of forward secrecy for the CHILD_SA. New here? Remote Type = 0. . The DH Group configured under the crypto map would be used only during rekey.