Where Does The Kilcher Family Really Live, When Do I Get My Full Sail Launch Box, Sheltie Puppies For Sale In Fayetteville, Nc, Canterbury Resident Portal, Star News Mugshots Brunswick County, Articles C

Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. Bye If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. It is fantastic on my old 5d. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) She's cold? Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. Its nice to have the F/2. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. Shoot shiny metal at a wide aperture and you'll see some very extreme purple fringing. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. Juksu, your point is well taken. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. Have not used a 70-200 since. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. You currently have javascript disabled. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? p.s. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. Digital camera types . Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. If so, which one? Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. It could really use an update to its coatings. Contrasty but not harsh. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. One of my very best lenses! Big F-value.Light. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. If you can afford it buy this lens, you will love it. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. Why so salty? Be careful with the focus. The latter are designed for crop sensor cameras and the back of the lens sticks too far into the body of the camera and would hit the EOS-clip filter. I agree to some extent with many of the critics of the article and disagree with much of its content, but I also have respect for the the author's right to express those opinions. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. Image quality, weight and value for money. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. $218.00 for 7 days. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. Tack sharp at f/2. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. If You can afford it, buy it! There is no such thing, in my opinion. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Dear Trevor, But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. My first shot was a section of the constellation Sagittarius that included the Lagoon Nebula, and Trifid Nebula. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Simple as that! But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 - in my subjects' skin. It is fantastically sharp, can make beautiful blurred backgrounds and bokeh, and is both light and inexpensive for what you get. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. I see that many commenters did not get what this lens can do. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM (72mm filters, 0.9m/3' close-focus, 25.0 oz./708g, about $1,035.) Agreed. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . For example, the legendary Canon 85mm F1.2L weighs in at 1025g, and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art isn't too light either at 1130g. wew.. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. There's just nothing there. When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Can I assume that this article applies only to full frame & not to micro four thirds? And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Add To Cart. Images that sing. Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. Could use a few updates. Lenses with extreme sharpness and bokeh tend to be heavy. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. I have used and still use the 135MM F/2 l lens. You don't have to worry about shopping for a better lens anymore. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. My copy has very stiff manual focus though and is quite heavy. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. Im getting a samyang to use with my 60D. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! Well saturated but neutral. And now important part: This lens can be stopped down if desired effect is not required and no, with 85/1.8 you will never get this effect. I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. IQ will rival any other lens. Will this ever get old? As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Focal length is great. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. It seems lazy to me. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? [emailprotected]. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. One thing I am most stun is its AF performance. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? They account for much of the disagreement that we see on-line (but not for the rudeness and viciousness of some of it). Make sure to select your camera mount when checking the price (Check current price). The first shot I ever took with this lens was of my neighbor's cat, as it was sneaking around in a bush. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! Super sharp from f2. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. It's gross, all is a matter of balance and the perfect one, given you want sharp and fuzzy elements in your picture, is in the blend, and the way details seems to disappear gracefully (while keeping a level of readability). Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). Check out I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! Olympus 75mm f1.82. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while.